ADL – Anti-Semitic Posts on Twitter

May 13, 2018

A recent report released by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) claims that the organization tracked some 4.2 million anti-Semitic tweets between January 2017 and January 2018. The Media, both traditional and social, repeated the claims widely, giving an impression that Twitter was a hotbed of anti-Semitism.

As with all matters concerning “hate,” in the Media, a closer look is warranted.

First off, anti-Semitism is a very real and a very dangerous social phenomenon. While even one hateful tweet is one too many, the definition of “hate” is nebulous at best and often tailored to the goals of the people defining it. To fully understand the reality on the ground it is imperative to review the definitions and methodologies used in creating  such reports. Let’s check the facts.

The ADL’s report, Quantifying Hate: A Year of Anti-Semitism on Twitter (no authors are named) claims that a review of English language tweets over 2017, using both computer algorithms and human review, yielded 4.2 million anti-Semitic tweets and re-tweets by 3 million users.

“The current findings are based on a complex Boolean query designed to identify language frequently used by anti-Semites.

The query was broadly written to encompass obvious expressions of anti-Semitism, including classic anti-Semitic stereotypes; code words and symbols sometimes used in an anti-Semitic fashion; and also subtle references to anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.”

The query was indeed “broadly written” and was “designed to detect anti-Semitism in the following categories:

  1. Classic anti-Semitic stereotypes (e.g. references to Jews as greedy; controllers of banks, media, governments and academia; under-miners of culture and racial purity; cursed for killing Jesus; etc.)

  2. Positive references to or promotion of known anti-Semitic personalities, authors, books, articles, videos and podcasts

  3. References to anti-Semitic conspiracy theories (e.g. Jewish control of the Federal Reserve; the existence of a “Zionist Occupation Government,” etc.)

  4. Holocaust denial

  5. Epithets used for Jews (e.g. “kike”) and against Jews (e.g. “goddamn Jews”)

  6. Code words and anti-Semitic symbols such as the “echo symbol” (“((( )))”)

The current report includes criticism of Israel or Zionism when such criticism makes use of classic anti-Semitic language or conspiracy theories, or when it ascribes evil motivations to significant numbers of Jews. General criticism of Israel or its policies is not counted as anti-Semitism.

That covers a lot of territory, and, as the report’s Table of Contents indicates, includes several topics that may be, at best, tangentially associated with actual anti-Semitism.

ADL TOC

Including references to Harvey Weinstein, George Soros, Zionism and “globalists” will undoubtedly uncover many genuine anti-Semitic references but will also include many legitimate criticisms of cultural and political movements and players.

Let’s dig a little deeper:

  • As of 2017, Twitter had 330 million active users, of which 100 million were active daily
  • Over 500,000,000 tweets are sent every day, or 182 BILLION a year. A 2012 survey estimated that 38% of all tweets were in English, though this percentage has most certainly changed since then. The ADL study limited its sample to English language tweets only.
  • The United States makes up 21% of all Twitter users worldwide. Lacking demographic data later than the 2012 report referenced above, and excluding all tweets from other English speaking countries, (The UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, etc.) and tweets in English from other countries, a simple one-for-one extrapolation (21% of users accounting for 21% of tweets) would suggest that Americans sent more than 38 billion tweets in 2017.

    Obviously, not all American tweets were in English, but even 75% of this incredibly low-balled estimate would yield 28 billion tweets, of which the ADL found 4 million to be questionable, or .014%.

  • An ADL press release notes that, whatever the actual number of English tweets studied for 2017, only 55,000 “were manually reviewed for the presence of anti-Semitism.”
  • A 2017 peer-reviewed study estimated that between nine and 15% of all Twitter users were computer generated “bots.”

In short, the methodology used in the ADL’s Twitter report was, at best, “broad,” and at worst, unreliable. The report includes a disclaimer referencing “the rise of ‘QAnon’ conspiracy theories” that illustrates just how broadly the term “anti-Semitism” was interpreted:

“The vast majority of QAnon-inspired conspiracy theories have nothing to do with anti-Semitism. However, a small percentage of tweets referencing QAnon also referred to Israel, Jews, Zionists, Rothschilds … , or George Soros. 

This study’s methodology does not allow us to determine how many of the QAnon tweets containing those terms actually expressed anti-Semitic sentiment, but an impressionistic review revealed some troubling examples.”

“Impressionistic reviews” revealing “some troubling examples” are not the stuff of hard research. It should be noted that the Anti-Defamation League, like the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), is a private “advocacy group,” which by its very definition means that the organization is “advocating” a particular point of view.

Online tax records indicate that the ADL averaged between $50- and $60 million dollars in donations a year between 2011 and 2016, with 2% to 2.5% of that money going to “program services,” such as this anonymous survey, and 40% to 45% going to “Executive compensation, other salaries and wages.”

With tens of millions of dollars in compensation at stake, a strong financial incentive to interpret anti-Semitism as broadly as possible cannot be ignored.

As we noted at the beginning of this post, the Media, in all its forms, gladly repeats the claims of the ADL and SPLC without performing any review. Lurid claims of “hate groups” everywhere and anti-Semitism on the rise make for profitable click bait. The Media also have an undeniable financial incentive for promoting such “reports” without ever asking to see the evidence.

Again, anti-Semitism is a very real thing and must not be tolerated in any way, but lumping criticism of George Soros’ political activities and re-tweets of anonymous QAnon conspiracy theories is not a legitimate method of documenting it.

Research for the report was allegedly performed by two ADL in-house organizations, the ADL’s Center on Extremism and Center on Technology and Society, with no external peer review or oversight.

If the data is good the results ought to be easily replicable independently. Anonymous reports generated by in-house organs simply do not meet basic research standards.

Big claims demand big proof and the ADL needs to show its work. A poorly estimated 4 million suspicious tweets out of tens of billions posted in 2017 is statistically insignificant.

Prove it or remove it.

Advertisements

SPLC — 2018 Telemarketing Scam

April 25, 2018

Earlier this month the Southern Poverty Law Center released its IRS Form 990 tax return, noting that the company took in a staggering $136,373,624 dollars in Fiscal Year 2017 (leaving a paltry “non-profit” of $76,589,303 for the year) and the already-bloated Endowment Fund exploded from $319 million for 2016 to $432 million for 2017, 99.17% of which is “unrestricted” in use.

Page 39 of the document breaks down what the company paid third-party telemarketers for the year. As usual, the amount paid to the telemarketers far exceeded the amount of money raised over the phone in the name of “fighting hate.”

2017 Telemarketers

The SPLC paid four third-party telemarketing companies $3,177,807 donor-dollars to raise only $1,801,207 donor-dollars on its behalf.

This leaves a shortfall of $1,376,600.

As usual, this means that not only did every dime raised from unsuspecting first-time donors go directly to the telemarketers, but thousands upon thousands of longtime donors got tapped to pick up the shortfall without ever realizing it.

How many people does it take to mop up a seven-digit deficit? At $100 dollars a pop, 13,766 loyal, longtime donors. At a more reasonable $25 dollar donation, just over 55,000 suckers.

How can a private advocacy group afford this kind of horrific hemorrhaging year after year? It’s quite simple. The SPLC takes a minor financial hit each year to get the names and addresses of thousands of proven first-time donors. They feed this information into their own huge, uber-efficient in-house fundraising machine and the future donations will roll in for years, if not decades, to come. As the old saying goes, “It takes money to make money.”

Granted, the SPLC is not the only non-profit to engage in this kind of thing, and all donors have a responsibility to ask any telemarketers how much of their donation will actually reach the organization in question.

We at Watching the Watchdogs feel that the public ought to see the real numbers and see for themselves where their money actually goes.

The “Financial Information” page on the SPLC website makes the claim that “During the last fiscal year, approximately 68% of our total expenses were spent on program services.”

That’s a noble goal, and when you look at Line 16b on Page 2 of the Form 990, you see that the company spent 21% of those expenses on out-and-out fundraising. When you add in the $12 million in “joint costs,” those fundraising costs attributed to other departments (“Management” spent just over $1,000,000 on postage, for example) found on Line 26 of Page 11, however, you find that the SPLC spent 41% of its budget on fundraising right off the top.

When you figure in salaries, facilities costs and all of the other expenses of running a company with more than 300 employees, it’s pretty hard to see how 68% of expenses went to “program services.”

In the long run, most of the donors don’t really care. They each have their own concept of “fighting hate” and their canceled donation check or SPLC bumper sticker allows them to virtue signal to the world how wonderful they are.

In short, the donors are buying a product that the Southern Poverty Law Center is only too happy to sell them.

Caveat emptor.

SPLC Executive Suite: 47 Years of “Whites Only”

April 15, 2018

This month the Southern Poverty Law Center released its tax records for 2017, revealing staggering revenues in excess of $136 million (compared to $58 million for 2016), and a bloated cash-on-hand endowment fund approaching half a BILLION dollars.

We’ll take a closer look at those numbers in upcoming posts. While profits at the company are at levels never seen before, there is one glaring statistic that has remained steadfastly unchanged since the Nixon Administration.

In 1994, Dan Morse and Greg Jaffe, two reporters from the SPLC’s hometown newspaper, the Montgomery Advertiser, published an 8-day exposé of the company. Amazingly, the reporters discovered that 23 years after opening its doors for business in 1971, there were no minorities among the top leadership of the “nation’s leading civil rights organization.”

The headline for the lead article in the series reads: “Equal Treatment? No Blacks in Center’s Leadership”

“Inside, no blacks have held top management positions in the center’s 23-year history, and some former employees say blacks are treated like second-class citizens.”

The article noted that the handful of Black attorneys hired in the company’s early days had all quit, some citing a “plantation mentality,” and that the only African-American in any position of authority managed the mail room, where she had worked for the past 20-odd years.

Equal treatment

Fast forward to November 2000, when Ken Silverstein noted in his landmark article for Harper’s Magazine, “The Church of Morris Dees,” that nothing had changed since Morse and Jaffe’s articles had been published.

When we first read these surprising claims in 2009 we were astonished and set out to discover if the SPLC had ever gotten around to practicing what it so profitably preached. Using the company’s IRS Form 990 tax returns, (which can now be found on the ProPublica website, going back to 2001), we found that the Executive Suite of the Southern Poverty Law Center was just as white in 2008 as it had been in 1978, 1988 and 1998.

Here we are in 2018 and the SPLC’s monochromatic streak remains unbroken:

2017 Execs

2017 salaries

2016 and 2015

2014 and 2013

2012 and 2011

Our clumsy Photoshop fumbling aside, it becomes readily apparent that SPLC founder Morris Dees has no intention of integrating Executive Suite any time soon.

Perhaps the most glaring exception from the annual “highest paid” officer list is Lecia Brooks, who joined the SPLC in 2004 and currently holds TWO directorships at the company simultaneously, something no other officer has ever done.

lecia_brooks

Lecia Brooks

Ms. Brooks has NEVER appeared on the “highest paid” list, even when the salaries listed dipped to a paltry $70,000 a year. Meanwhile, her all-white co-Directors, even the company’s head secretary, have been pulling down six-digit salaries for decades.

Among Ms. Brooks’ highly paid co-Directors is Maureen Costello, who runs the SPLC’s “Teaching Tolerance” wing, which purports to promote diversity in the K-12 classroom. In that same 1994 Montgomery Advertiser article that noted no Blacks at the top, Morse and Jaffe noted this interesting factoid:

“The Law Center’s ambitious new project, Teaching Tolerance, which is designed to promote racial and cultural justice throughout America’s schools, is produced by an eight-member all-white staff according to the Law Center.”

While Teaching Tolerance does not publish the names of its rank-and-file staff, its Directors have always been whites, since its founding in 2004, except for a brief interregnum in 2010, when Lecia Brooks was allowed to keep the seat warm until the highly diverse Ms. Costello could be hired.

Costello

Maureen Costello

In closing, it is worth noting that many long-time SPLC donors and watchers may recall that the company’s first president was Julian Bond, the legendary civil rights activist from the 1960s. “Julian Bond was Black,” they’ll say, “So Morris Dees does hire minorities for top positions!”

As usual with Mr. Dees and the SPLC, a closer look at the facts tells a different story.

On page 132 of his 1991 autobiography, “A Season for Justice,” (reprinted verbatim in 2003 as “A Lawyer’s Journey“), Dees writes about the earliest days of the SPLC when he was preparing to mail out the very first of that organization’s fund-raising appeals, (using the 700,000-plus names on the donor list he received for “volunteering” to serve as finance manager for George McGovern’s presidential bid.)

Dees had made his millions in direct-mail marketing, not law, and he knew how to write a successful sales pitch:

“Before we could ask for money, we had to establish credibility. We needed a prominent figure whose presence would announce the center’s values and promise. Julian Bond seemed the perfect choice.”

“I had never met Julian Bond. My friend Chuck Morgan… working for the ACLU… arranged a meeting in Atlanta. When I told [Bond] about our hopes and plans, he agreed to serve as president of the Law Center, a largely honorary position.”

A memo from 1971 in the Julian Bond Papers collection at the University of Virginia indicates that the “honorary president” was paid a monthly “fee” (not “salary”) of $1,000 a month in exchange for his signature on fundraising letters written by Morris Dees in Julian Bond’s name.

Bond had returned to college in Atlanta in 1971 and remained there throughout his entire honorary presidency, a good three-hour drive from Montgomery on today’s highways.

Julian Bond was a paid celebrity endorser and no more, as noted by the fact that Bond gets exactly two paragraphs in Dees’ 335-page memoir and is never heard from again.

Julian Bond had no more to do with running the Southern Poverty Law Center than Michael Jordan has with running Hanes.

You have to hand it to Morris Dees, though. He’s managed to keep his Head Office lily-white for nearly fifty years. Even the NFL and NBA couldn’t pull that off.

 

SPLC — 2018 Hate Map: Fake News Galore

February 25, 2018

The Southern Poverty Law Center recently released its 2018 “Hate Map” fundraising tool, and as usual, the Media is regurgitating the company’s claims without performing even the most rudimentary fact-checks.

Fortunately, that’s what we here at Watching the Watchdogs do best.

First, a little housekeeping:

  1. The 2018 “Hate Map,” as with all of its predecessors, refers to the number of alleged “hate groups” the SPLC designated for the previous fiscal year. The 2018 map refers to alleged groups from FY 2017.
  2. There is no legal or even universal definition for the term “hate group,” which is why even the FBI cannot, does not, designate “hate groups,” but somehow a private “advocacy group” can do so, early and often.
  3. Even the SPLC, which is the sole arbiter of the lucrative “hate group” label, does not have a firm definition for “hate group” beyond the nebulous and elastic claim that “All hate groups have beliefs or practices that attack or malign an entire class of people, typically for their immutable characteristics.”That “definition” is suitably vague enough to be applied to nearly anything. As we will soon see, a “group” need not even be an actual boots-on-the-ground “group” to be included on the list. The “Hate Map” is rife with one-man websites, online vendors and nearly 300 “Statewide” phantoms.
  4. As Mark Potok, the SPLC’s former longtime Intelligence Director, stated publicly on numerous occasions: “…a “hate group” has nothing to do with criminality… [or] potential for violence…” Rather, as Potok put it, “It’s all about ideology.”No crime. No violence. Just “wrong thinking.”

    According to the SPLC, “Hate group activities can include criminal acts, marches, rallies, speeches, meetings, leafleting or publishing.” That any advocacy group could deliberately conflate six of the most fundamental First Amendment civil rights with “criminal acts” and “hate group activities” is beyond belief.

    Under this “definition,” Dr. King, the Freedom Riders and anyone even remotely associated with the Civil Rights Movement would be guilty of “hate group activities.”

With this background information in mind, let’s have a look at the 2018 “Hate Map.”

The latest “hate group” count is up from 917 to 954, which, in the wake of the very real racial tensions of 2017, including the Charlottesville riots, is a surprisingly low increase of only 4%

Keep in mind, when you are the sole arbiter of the “hate group” label, you can make up as many as you want. The Media, and more importantly, the almighty donors, would have swallowed nearly any number the company saw fit to claim.

As mentioned above, the SPLC cannot actually locate 297 of these groups on any map, including their own. This number includes 291 “Statewide” chapters, for which no information other than an alleged home state is provided, as well as two groups skulking in “Incomplete,” one each in “Eastern” and “Central” Pennsylvania and one each in “North” and “South” California.

Hard data doesn’t get any harder than this, folks. Fortunately, the Media and the donors aren’t all that big into facts.

It’s also worth mentioning that there were “only” 191 “Statewide” phantoms on last year’s map, for a surge of 51%, meaning the company is losing “groups” faster than it can designate them. That 4% increase must have come from somewhere.

The SPLC provides no information on these alleged groups whatsoever. It cannot provide a known location or any kind of headcount for the membership. We get to take the company’s word for it that these “groups” really, really exist.

That’s not good enough and it certainly isn’t good journalism. Big claims demand big proof, or any proof, for that matter.

This year, Watching the Watchdogs is launching the hashtag #ProveItOrRemoveIt to encourage the SPLC into showing its proof that any of its 954 alleged groups actually exist.

Well, surprisingly, despite coming off the most racist year in decades, the increase didn’t come from the reliable Ku Klux Klan bogeyman. According to the fearmongers at the SPLC, Klan groups actually decreased by 45% in 2017, from 130 to 72, tying the record low set during the Obama Administration.

The SPLC attributes the precipitous drop to the fact that today’s white supremacists are put off by the old fashioned image of the Invisible Empire. Today’s racists pine for a “hipper” image, they posit.

2018 Ku Klux Klan _ Southern Poverty Law Center

While homeless “Statewide” phantoms made up 23% of of the Klan groups on the 2017 map, that number has increased to 39% of the much smaller count for 2018.

Neo-Nazis seemed to be all the rage in 2017 and the “Hate Map” backs that up by claiming a 21% increase in Hitler wannabees from 99 alleged groups to 120 last year.

What the report doesn’t mention directly (you have to look for it, as we do) is that the number of “Statewide” Neo-Nazi phantoms “exploded” by 100%, from 45 to 91.

White Nationalists remained stagnant at 100 alleged groups last year, surprisingly. The number of WN “Statewide” phantoms barely inched up at all, from 30 to 35. Given the lurid media coverage of Charlottesville and other atrocities, one could be excused for predicting unprecedented growth in 2017.

Even the Racist Skinheads took a hit last year, down from 79 to 71 alleged groups, though the number of “Statewide,” “Central” and “Eastern” generalities grew from 60 to 63.

Say that last part out loud: The Southern Poverty Law Center cannot account for EIGHTY-NINE PERCENT of its alleged Racist Skinhead groups and yet the Media considers the numbers to be utterly reliable. Wow.

Considering that it was the removal of Confederate war statues that sparked the Charlottesville riots and at least a few other confrontations last year, readers may be surprised to learn that the number of “Neo-Confederate” groups designated by the SPLC last year dropped by an incredible 29%, from 43 to 31 alleged groups.

“Statewide” chapters celebrating the “Lost Cause” dipped slightly from seven to six, but on the plus side, Weogufka, Alabama, (Population: 282) joined Wetumpka, AL, and Waxahachie, Texas, on the list. (This really isn’t statistically relevant, but it is fun to say out loud.)

Anti-Immigrant, Anti-LGBT, Anti-Muslim and Christian Identity groups all remained largely unchanged for the year, so where exactly do we find any actual increases?

This year marks the debut of an entirely new “hate group” category, the Neo-Volkisch, which the SPLC describes thus:

“Neo-Völkisch adherents worship the Norse or Germanic gods, spirituality premised on the survival of white Europeans and the preservation of dead or dying cultures they presume to embody. Such individuals and groups use a variety of terms to describe their spirituality such as Odinism or Wotanism, Odalism, heathenism, Ásatrú or even paganism. Qualifiers like “Germanic” or “proto-Germanic” are sometimes attached to those terms. Other qualifiers like “Norse tradition” might also be used.”

Are they dangerous?

“…violence rarely erupts from the neo-Völkisch movement.”

So why are they a “hate group” now?

“Hyper-masculine imagery fetishized within neo-Völkisch spheres reinforces misogyny and traditional gender roles.”

Dear Freya! Not “traditional gender roles”! Oh, the humanity! What does that say about the Amish, Muslims, Orthodox Jewry and a large percentage of Latino immigrants? Will those hyper-masculine men make next year’s “Hate Map”?

So where are the 28 Neo-Volkisch groups located? Just where you’d expect to find Norsemen: Grand Rapids, Michigan, Brownsville and Grass Valley, California, Knoxville, Tennessee, Lynchburg, Virginia, and that perennial hotbed of hyper-masculine, horn-helmed hatred, Apache Junction, Arizona.

The other 22 alleged chapters? “Statewide.” Yes, friends, the SPLC has uncovered 28 chapters of a new species of “hate,” but they cannot tell you where 79% of them are actually located.

“That makes perfect sense to us!” quoth the Media. “Nothing to see here…”

In keeping with the man-bashing, the SPLC added a second new category last year, Male Supremacy. Calling it “the gateway drug to the Alt-Right,” (yes, someone was actually paid cash money to write that…), the two new “Male Supremacist” groups seem to be websites, rather than boots-on-the-ground groups that actually do things. The SPLC cites several blogs to prove their existence.

And, wait for it… 100% of these wimmin-hater “groups” are “Statewide.”

Last year, the SPLC counted 201 Black and Black Muslim groups in the land, the largest category by far.

(Even though this number included 68 chapters of the Nation of Islam and eight other Black Muslim groups tucked under the catch-all heading of “General Hate,” subsection, “Other,” none of these Islam-based groups have been deemed to be actual “Muslim hate groups” because the SPLC doesn’t track such things. Irks the donors, dontcha know, and that can run into money.)

This year the number of Black and Black Muslim “hate groups” has increased to 241, including the eight aforementioned “Other” groups, for an increase of 20%. The number of self-described Muslim groups rose from 68 to 94.

As the SPLC’s own chart indicates, these alleged Black “hate groups” have increased by more than 400% since the start of the century.

2018-Black Nationalist _ Southern Poverty Law Center

“Not to worry,” You may say. “The odds are that 8 out of 10 of these alleged “groups” are homeless “Statewide” phantoms.” Actually, only eight out of 241 are “Statewide,” up by a few pegs from last year.

Among the crimes attributed to these “Black Nationalist” groups are “forms of black nationalism [that] are strongly anti-white and anti-Semitic, and a number of religious versions assert that blacks — not Jews — are the Biblical “chosen people” of God.”

Yes, that is correct. The Southern Poverty Law Center has determined who the REAL “chosen people” of God are. Any other group claiming the mantle for themselves is practicing “hate.” Seriously.

Ah, but it plays well with many of the donors of the Fundamentalist Christian and Jewish persuasions.

And that, friends, is the whole purpose of the fantastically lucrative “Hate Map.” As shown, the numbers are not based in any kind of reality, the SPLC cannot identify how many people are actually in these alleged groups and makes no claim that the alleged groups are potentially violent or criminal.

“It’s strictly ideological,” said Mark Potok, and those ideologies, held by a pathetically minute portion of the US population today, are what agitate the donors and power the SPLC’s enormous money machine. Here are a few other things Mr. Potok has had to say about “hate groups” and the SPLC’s methodology:

“The numbers are absolutely soft,” said Mark Potok, a Southern Poverty Law Center spokesman. “We are talking about a tiny number of Americans who are members of hate groups – I mean, infinitesimal.” (Arlene Levinson, “Hate Groups, Crimes Said Rare in US,” Associated Press, July 8, 1999).

“We see this political struggle, right? …I mean we’re not trying to change anybody’s mind. We’re trying to wreck the groups, and we are very clear in our head, this is… we are trying to destroy them. Not to send them to prison unfairly or not take their free speech rights away… but as a political matter, to destroy them.”  (Holiday, 2008, track 13, https://archive.org/details/MarkPotok).

“I don’t think there’s any doubt that these are human beings and it’s a mistake to regard them as just a bunch of sociopaths… though most of them are. Let me say… our aim… sometimes the press will describe us as monitoring hate groups and so on. I want to say plainly that our aim in life is to destroy these groups. Completely destroy them!” (Sept. 2007,  https://youtu.be/fnTz2ylJo_8)

Clearly, neither Mr. Potok, before he got the boot from the company about a year ago, nor any of the six-digit-salaried white millionaires who run the company, or any of the other 295 company employees have any desire or any intention of “destroying” any “hate groups” anytime soon. You don’t kill the Golden Goose.

The SPLC is a multimillion-dollar “advocacy group.” It’s product is “hate group” fearmongering and its loyal customers are the almighty donors, nearly all of whom self-identify as “Progressive.” The company sells the customers what they want and the customers cannot get enough of the product. It’s a business, folks, not a mission.

Charity Navigator says they could be looking at a cool Billion-with-a-B donor-dollars for Fiscal 2017. Those numbers are due out soon and we look forward to breaking them down thereafter.

Charity Navigator: SPLC Donations for 2017 Could Reach One Billion Dollars

December 28, 2017

The Southern Poverty Law Center won’t release its annual IRS Form 990 tax return until February, but preliminary reports indicate that 2017 donations could approach ONE BILLION DOLLARS.

Charity Navigator, a nationally respected rating service of non-profit organizations, noted last April that donations to the SPLC during the first 100 days of the Trump Administration, from January 20 to April 20, 2017 were up by 1,400%.

Charity Navigator, First 100 Days

Source: Charity Navigator

While we do not have the actual figures for that period, the SPLC’s current Form 990 indicates that the company received just over $50 million in donations for FY 2016, which would average out to $12.5 million a quarter.

Math was never our strong suit, we freely admit, but if our back-of-the-envelope calculations are correct, a 1,400% increase on $12.5 million would come to a staggering $187,500,000 for a single quarter alone.

If there are any mathematicians in the house, or functional numerates of any kind, please speak up if these numbers are off in any way.

IF the figures above are accurate, and we multiply them by four to get a total for a full fiscal year, we come up with a nice, round $750,000,000 overall. That’s three-quarters of a billion dollars to you and me.

Keep in mind that total SPLC receipts from 2001 to 2016 “only” add up to around $624 million COMBINED and you can start to comprehend the magnitude of this statistic.

SPLC profits 2001 to 2016

And these numbers only reflect the increase on an average SPLC fiscal quarter. Charity Navigator’s estimate only extends to April, 2017, and while the country experienced numerous political and social events during the year, both Trump- and non-Trump-related, the real floodgates to SPLC donations opened in August, following the infamous Charlottesville riots.

At that time, major corporations, artists and celebrities threw millions at the SPLC in ham-fisted attempts to out-virtue signal each other as to who really hated “hate” more, and that does not include the uncounted number of individual donors who followed suit.

The SPLC makes it so easy to strike a pose and assuage your white guilt: just write a check.

And, as we noted at the time, it only took the SPLC two weeks to figure out how to cash in on the death of Heather Heyer in Charlottesville by slapping her photo on their unscrupulous “Wall of Tolerance” fundraising tool.

We won’t have any idea of the actual magnitude of money that changed hands until next February, but as the SPLC’s fiscal year closes on October 31 each year, it is reasonable to predict that the final quarter of August through October will show an increase far in excess of a mere 1,400%.

The good news is that with a billion dollars in cash coming in, the SPLC can finally retire from the odious fundraising business and live off the interest. Granted, that could put hundreds of SPLC employees out of work, but with the nation’s most profitable non-profit on their resumés, it won’t be long before they are snapped up by other hopeful contenders for the title.

You read it here first, folks.

SPLC profits from “I Am So Sick of White Guys” coloring book

December 23, 2017

As we have noted uncounted times on this blog, there is no legal or even standard definition for a “hate group.” Even the Southern Poverty Law Center, a company that rakes in hundreds of millions of dollars by selling “hate groups” to Progressives, does not have an actual definition for the term.

Instead, the company cooked up a non-definition that is so broad that anyone could figure out some way to apply it to just about any group they wanted. According to the experts at the SPLC:

“All hate groups have beliefs or practices that attack or malign an entire class of people, typically for their immutable characteristics.”

If those are the SPLC’s only criteria, “attacking or maligning an entire class of people,” then does it strike anyone else as odd that “the nation’s leading civil rights organization,” (at least when it was still in the civil rights business several years ago) is accepting a cash percentage from the sales of something called the “I Am So Sick of White Guys” coloring book?

 

Sick-of-White-Guys-book

 

“Relax,” say the authors. This isn’t maligning an entire class of people… it’s satire! Get it?

Sure we get it. Try swapping out the descriptor “White” from the title with any other color/ethnicity in the Diversity Rainbow and see how much fun it is. Change “Guys” to “Gals” (Chicks dig it when you call them “gals,” btw) and watch the Feminist fur fly. Try it at home, “I’m so sick of One-legged, African-American LGBTQRSTUV Activists!.” Why, the variations just write themselves. No “hate” here, after all. It’s satire, fer cryin’ out loud!

As the co-authors, who are both evil white guys themselves, remind us “Be open to hearing other perspectives or opinion. And don’t be so defensive.” Spoken like true Progressives. Say anything you please, as long as we permit it.

Want to have a real hoot? Swap out the picture of Putin with one of George Soros holding the strings. The Anti-Defamation League, which does not have a good track record with satire, will be all over you like the yellow-tooth stink on an Antifa bandana. There’s too much money at stake, don’t you know?

And speaking of money, catch the note at the very bottom of the cover stating that ten percent of this ten-dollar treasure will be donated to the SPLC. Thank heavens for that. According to this year’s online tax records, the company came into 2017 with less than $320 million in tax-free, unrestricted cash-on-hand. This boon could be a game changer.

Or could it? Let’s say they can sell 100,000 copies of this adult coloring book. The $10 grand sent to the SPLC would barely buy a single hour of Millionaire Morris Dees’ frequent speaker’s “honoraria,” and only then if your group wasn’t composed of evil white males. Otherwise, “No dough? No Mo.”

Let’s be optimistic, though. As the SPLC well knows, there are millions of people out there who are really, really sick of white males. Let’s say these guys manage to sell ONE MILLION COPIES of their magnum opus. That’s $100,000 to the cash-strapped SPLC, a whole lot of moolah in anybody’s book.

Well, in anybody’s book except the SPLC’s bookkeeper’s book. Last year the SPLC paid third-party telemarketers $2,266,887 donor-dollars to raise only $1,271,287 donor-dollars, for a net loss of $955,600. A lousy hundred grand wouldn’t even scratch the surface of such an incredible deficit. Instead, the SPLC will simply redirect the donations of everyone who gave through the telemarketers, as well as another 10,000 to 40,000 rank-and-file loyal SPLC donors.

At the end of the day, what we have here is a perfect example of “virtue signalling.” The authors are merely piling on to a bandwagon that has seen celebrities and major corporations demonstrating how much they hate “hate” by simply sending a check to the SPLC, and that doesn’t include the millions of new individual donors the company will pick up this year. That’s all you have to do. Send a little cash to a company that already has more money than it will ever spend and you can sleep the sleep of the Righteous.

Too bad so much of that money will go to pay the telemarketers and the six-digit salaries of the SPLC’s all-white Executive Suite. No matter. “Hate” was fought, after all.

The SPLC has no problem whatsoever if you want to bash white males (as long as they are not gay, Jewish, or one of the other more recent protected status groups) as long as you a) fig-leaf it as satire (“Can’t you take a joke?”), and b) cut the SPLC in for a slice of the pie. No hypocrisy here. Move along.

Don’t take our word for it. Go the company’s website and search “coloring book” and see if you can find anything that says “The SPLC refuses to accept money from a group that attacks or maligns an entire class of people.”

That would be bad for business.

“The SPLC is Lying to Us”

December 3, 2017

We came across this excellent YouTube video not long ago. The video’s creator, who identifies herself as Annette Rivers and an experienced fact checker, uses great imagery and well reasoned dialog to expose how the Southern Poverty Law Center (and by extension, other major Hate Industry players) manipulates the “facts” for fundraising purposes.

Ms. Rivers manages to sum up in nine minutes what we at Watching the Watchdogs have been trying to explain for nine years.

Thank you, Ms. Rivers, for showing us how fact checking should be done in the 21st century. Well done!

The SPLC and the DACA Opportunity

November 12, 2017

For the past several months, the Southern Poverty Law Center has been issuing a steady stream of hand-wringing rhetoric over the uncertain fate of hundreds of thousands of migrants who were brought to the US illegally as children by their parents.

Under the Obama Administration, a program known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) would allow the illegals to stay in the country and obtain temporary work permits. To date, there are about 800,000 migrants enrolled in the program, known collectively as “Dreamers,” in reference to the legislation that created the DACA program, the so-called “DREAM Act.”

The Trump Administration has repealed DACA and the enrollees are currently facing the possibility of deportation to their home countries. Naturally, the fundraisers at the SPLC recognize this situation as a prime money-making opportunity and they have been producing a steady stream of emotionally charged rhetoric aimed at their largely-Progressive donor base.

We believe that not only does this situation represent a huge opportunity FOR the the Dreamers and their families, but that the SPLC is uniquely situated to make the transition a success beyond comprehension… if it chose to help.

  1. The first and most important thing to remember is that there are very few actual children among the Dreamers. While brought to this country illegally as children, only 2.5% of the group are between the ages of 15 and 18. The vast majority of Dreamers are between the ages of 20 and 35. One cannot even apply for DACA deferment before the age of 15.

    Heart-rending SPLC fundraising rhetoric of infants being torn from their mother’s bosom are highly exaggerated for emotional impact. It would a simple enough remedy to extend deferment to the youngest cohort until the age of 18.

  2. Another of the requirements for DACA eligibility is an education. A high school diploma or GED is mandatory, and many of the Dreamers have college degrees.

    In fact, the SPLC and other illegal immigration advocates make great political hay by claiming that most of the biggest tech companies created in the 21st century were founded by immigrants. Not “illegal” immigrants, mind you, but pointing out that minor detail is “racist.”

  3. Nearly 80% of the Dreamers are Mexican citizens, some 632,000 in all. Just imagine the effect of returning more than half a million educated, entrepreneurial young adults to that country’s economy. The Mexican government has and has announced that it will welcome the Dreamers home “with open arms!

    According to the LA Times, Mexico’s foreign secretary, Luis Videgaray stated:

    “I don’t know of any country that is willing to ship doctors, accountants, lawyers to another country,” Mexico’s foreign secretary Luis Videgaray told The Times in an interview Tuesday. “That’s just a transfer of human capital. That would be a big win for Mexico to have these young kids that are law abiding, creative, full of energy and well trained. All of them have a high school diploma. And the majority of them are college educated. It would be a big loss to the U.S., to the U.S. economy in particular.”

    “It’s very appealing to have college educated, English-speaking people and many companies in Mexico are looking for that profile of people,” Videgaray said.”

  4. The SPLC and other illegal immigrant advocates are forever touting the need to “bring the illegals out of the shadows.” Mexican DACA enrollees are FULL CITIZENS OF MEXICO. You cannot get much further out of the shadows than that.

    Again, far from being a human tragedy, the DACA situation has all of the makings of a huge opportunity.

So what can the SPLC and other illegal immigration advocates do to help? They can do what they do best: Raise money.

The SPLC currently has $319 million in unrestricted cash-on-hand, and with all of the publicity and donations the company received in FY 2017 there is no telling how much their Endowment Fund will balloon to in February’s tax form releases. But for our purposes, let’s stick with the numbers we have.

  1. What if the SPLC were to donate one third of its bloated endowment fund to resettling the DACA Dreamers? A hundred million will go a lot further in sunny Mexico than it will in the US.Part of that money could go toward resettling the young folks in their old home towns. We know that most have family back in Mexico, because their parents have been sending billions of dollars back home for decades. That’s pretty much the whole point of illegal immigration in the first place.
  2. If the Dreamers are anywhere near as entrepreneurial as the SPLC and other advocates claim, they will be setting up new businesses in thousands of towns and cities across Mexico in no time. In fact, with a US education and an acquired American consumer lifestyle, these people will be creating a huge demand for goods and services in their own home towns.

    Business is liable to be so good that the kids can send for their folks in the US, bringing them “out of the shadows” once and for all.

  3. Since many of the Dreamers are college educated, the SPLC could go one step beyond by endowing the creation of Dreamer business parks, where the bright minds can work together, as on a college campus, or at many high-tech firms in Silicon Valley.

    While the SPLC’s $100 million donation would be great seed money, the company could easily create crowdfunding sites, such as with GoFundMe, where well-meaning Progressives could donate money to the cause, thereby actually DOING something to help the Dreamers besides raging at Donald Trump.

    If there is anything the SPLC knows how to do, it’s raising cash. It only took the company five years to raise that last $100 million. With the huge publicity wave it is riding this year, the next hundred million should accrue in a fraction of that time.

    The SPLC’s public relations machinery is second to none in the non-profit industry. The company has been hiring PR types and fundraisers for over a decade. Headcount at the company has grown from 206 in 2009 to 291 in 2016, and since there hasn’t been a corresponding 41% jump in the number of court cases, these new faces most likely aren’t all lawyers.

    The company will be safe enough with a $200 million cushion in the meantime, and the Dreamers will have the opportunity to completely transform the Mexican economy.

  4. Many of the Dreamers’ parents came to this country poor, illiterate and knowing very little English. While it is possible that some of the Dreamers grew up in an immigrant environment without picking up a single word of their mother tongue, the odds are that these legal immigrants will have a much easier time of adjusting to repatriation.

    The SPLC loves to lament that “Many Dreamers don’t even know their home countries any more.” Well, their parents made the trip to a foreign culture in an unknown land with far fewer advantages and they managed to survive.

    Imagine how much easier the SPLC and the donors could make the transition back home!

So there it is, in a nutshell. Granted, it’s a back-of-the-envelope proposition at the moment, but it undoubtedly has the potential to turn an unhappy situation into a win-win opportunity for all involved.

What do you say, SPLC? Will you embrace this opportunity to make a real difference in thousands, and ultimately millions, of lives? Donating a third of your unprecedented endowment fund will in no way jeopardize the solvency of your company, and you’ll make it all back, and more, within a few short years.

It would sure silence a lot of your critics…

Will you turn your giant fundraising machinery toward a project that will change so many lives, one that will undercut so many of the foundations propping up illegal immigration in the first place? Will you take the lead in giving donors the opportunity to do some real good with their money, rather than paying the six-digit salaries of your all-white Executive Suite and your third-party telemarketers?

Think of the legacy it would create for SPLC Founder Morris Dees. Unlike his past achievements, this one would be beyond criticism. It’s pure Teflon.

Or, will you continue to beat the drums against Trump, that lowest of low-hanging fundraising fruit, because it is guaranteed to rile your Progressive donor base? Will you continue the relentless “hate group” fearmongering campaigns because they reliably bring in the dough?

This is an unprecedented opportunity for the Dreamers, for Mexico and for millions of illegal aliens “hiding in the shadows” in the USA. Your leadership, your largess, would be a game-changer. You could take the lead and make a real difference in the world.

And if nothing else, can you think of a better way to embarrass Donald Trump? Your donors will love it.

 

SPLC Cashes in on Las Vegas Massacre

October 4, 2017

As of this writing, it has been three days since the shooting in Las Vegas that left 59 dead and over 500 wounded and what does the “nation’s leading civil rights organization” have to say about the tragedy?

Nothing.

There’s not a single word on the Southern Poverty Law Center’s website about the massacre. The only reference to “Paddock” on the site is from 2014 and refers to the traditional animal enclosure used by ranchers and farmers and not the alleged Vegas gunman.

Compare that with at least 52 references to Charlottesville since August 12, including the crass announcement that the company was cashing in on the death of Heather Heyer, as Watching the Watchdogs noted.

Why the silence on the greatest mass murder of Americans in the 21st century? Because the victims were mostly white and were attending a Country music concert. Suffice it to say that there were probably few SPLC donors in the crowd.

Before you reach for your wallet to step into the SPLC’s fundraising breach, note that media sources are reporting that MGM Resorts, the mega-corporation that owns the Mandalay Bay hotel from where the alleged gunman opened fire has stated that:

“The company, [MGM Resorts CEO, Jim Murren] vowed, would match employee donations to: the Southern Poverty Law Center, NAACP, Anti-defamation League, Human Rights Campaign, Council on American Islamic Relations, Asian Pacific American Advocates and the League of United Latin American Citizens.”

Talk about “virtue signaling.” “We couldn’t do anything to prevent a deranged lone-wolf from murdering people, so we’re going to send money to “advocacy groups” that also couldn’t do anything to prevent a deranged lone-wolf from murdering people.”

And so, another multi-million dollar mega-corporation that couldn’t even acknowledge the deaths and woundings of hundreds of white Americans will receive even more millions for its lack of action.

The SPLC’s Morris Dees must be rubbing his hands in glee.

SPLC — White “Hate Groups” Declining

September 26, 2017

Did some number crunching today, using the impeccably accurate data produced by the Southern Poverty Law Center.

According to the “experts,” white “hate groups” have declined an average of 44% since 2011.

Black and Black Muslim “hate groups,” on the other hand, have increased by 44% since 2011.

SPLC Hate Groups 2011-2016

As we noted a few months ago, Black and Black Muslim groups are the largest single category on the SPLC’s lucrative “Hate Map” fundraising tool.

Odd that you don’t read more about that statistic in the media, no?

When you subtract the 191 “Statewide” phantom groups the SPLC added to this year’s map, those “groups” that the company cannot provide a known city or town location for (they’re out there, friends. The SPLC says so), the numbers become even more ludicrous:

Christian Identity — 1 phantom = 20
KKK – 30 phantoms = 100
Neo-Confederates — 7 phantoms = 36
Neo-Nazis — 45 phantoms = 44
Racisct Skinheads — 61 phantoms = 17 (Seriously?)
White Nationalists — 30 phantoms = 70

Black and Black Muslims — 5 phantoms = 196

These are the SPLC’s numbers, folks. They come right from the SPLC’s own website. That they are utter garbage, do not blame us.


%d bloggers like this: